Amazon Prime Day Lawsuit: Are the Deals Real?

A class action lawsuit claims Amazon Prime Day discounts are misleading. Here’s what shoppers and sellers need to know.

By Medha deb
Created on

The Legal Challenge to Amazon Prime Day’s ‘Best Deals’

Amazon Prime Day has long been marketed as the online shopping event of the year, promising members exclusive access to some of the deepest discounts across millions of products. But a new proposed class action lawsuit is calling that promise into question, arguing that many of the advertised savings are not what they appear to be. The core of the complaint is that Amazon is using artificially inflated “list prices” to make percentage-off claims look far more impressive than they actually are, potentially misleading millions of consumers.

How the Alleged Pricing Scheme Works

The lawsuit centers on the way Amazon displays discounts during Prime Day. On product pages, shoppers typically see a strikethrough price labeled as the “list price” or “original price,” followed by a lower sale price and a percentage-off claim like “39% off.” According to the complaint, these “list prices” are often not the actual prices at which the product was recently sold on Amazon.

Amazon’s own policy states that it will only show a strikethrough list price if the item was sold at or above that price on the platform within the last 90 days. The lawsuit claims that, in many cases, this condition is not met. Instead, the higher price shown is either a manufacturer’s suggested retail price (MSRP) that Amazon never actually charged, or a price that was briefly displayed for a very short period—sometimes just a single day—before being lowered again.

By using these inflated reference prices, the lawsuit argues, Amazon can advertise large percentage discounts that don’t reflect real savings. For example, if a product is shown as “39% off” from $179.95 down to $109.95, but the item had actually been selling for $130–$160 in the preceding months, the true discount is much smaller, or may not exist at all.

Read More

The Future of AI: Preventing a Big Tech Monopoly >

The Future of AI: Preventing a Big Tech Monopoly

Real-World Examples from the Complaint

The complaint includes several specific examples to illustrate the alleged pattern:

  • A pair of Bluetooth headphones advertised as “39% off” with a list price of $179.95 and a Prime Day price of $109.95. The lawsuit claims the headphones had not been sold at $179.95 on Amazon in the prior 90 days and that their actual recent price range was $130–$160.
  • A kids’ tablet promoted with a 40% discount, where the “sale price” during Prime Day was reportedly similar to the median price the tablet had been selling for in the days immediately before the event.
  • Other products cited include air fryers, children’s costumes, and various electronics, all allegedly advertised with percentage-off claims based on inflated or fictional prior prices.

These examples are used to support the broader claim that Amazon’s Prime Day pricing strategy is not about passing on real savings, but about creating the perception of a bargain to drive impulse purchases.

The Psychology Behind Prime Day Marketing

Prime Day is not just a sales event; it’s a carefully engineered experience designed to maximize conversion. The lawsuit highlights several psychological tactics that, when combined with allegedly inflated discounts, may cross the line into deceptive advertising:

  • Urgency and scarcity: Limited-time deals and countdown timers create pressure to buy quickly, reducing the time consumers have to compare prices elsewhere.
  • Percentage-off framing: Large percentage discounts (e.g., “up to 70% off”) are more emotionally compelling than small dollar amounts, even when the actual savings are modest.
  • Anchor pricing: The strikethrough “list price” serves as an anchor, making the sale price seem like a better deal than it would if presented in isolation.

When the anchor price is itself misleading, the entire perception of value is distorted. The complaint argues that this combination of tactics leads consumers to spend more than they otherwise would, or to buy items they wouldn’t have purchased at all, under the mistaken belief that they are getting a rare, time-sensitive bargain.

Who Is Being Sued and What Is the Legal Claim?

The proposed class action is filed against Amazon.com, Inc. and is styled as Armstrong et al. v. Amazon.com, Inc. The plaintiffs are seeking to represent a nationwide class of U.S. consumers who were Amazon Prime members and purchased products during Prime Day that were advertised with a percentage discount based on a strikethrough reference price, when the product had not actually been sold at that price on Amazon within the prior 90 days.

The legal claims include:

  • Violation of state consumer protection laws (often called “little FTC Acts”) that prohibit deceptive or unfair business practices.
  • Common law claims for fraudulent misrepresentation and unjust enrichment.
  • Allegations that Amazon’s conduct is unfair and misleading to reasonable consumers, even if the final sale price is not necessarily higher than what the product might sell for elsewhere.

The lawsuit does not argue that every Prime Day deal is fake, but rather that the use of inflated reference prices to generate large percentage-off claims is a systemic practice that misleads consumers about the true value of the discounts.

Amazon’s Defense and Industry Context

Amazon has not yet filed a formal response to the lawsuit, so its legal position is not fully known. However, the company has long maintained that its pricing and discount displays are designed to help customers understand value and that it follows its own policies regarding when strikethrough prices can be shown.

It’s worth noting that the practice of using MSRP or other non-transactional prices as a reference point is not unique to Amazon. Many online and brick-and-mortar retailers use manufacturer’s suggested retail prices, list prices, or “regular” prices that may not reflect actual recent selling prices. However, the lawsuit argues that Amazon’s scale, market dominance, and the intensity of Prime Day make these practices particularly impactful and potentially more deceptive.

Regulators and courts have increasingly scrutinized such practices. For example, the Federal Trade Commission has taken action against other retailers for using inflated “original” prices to make discounts appear larger than they are, especially when those prices were never actually charged to a meaningful number of customers.

Broader Regulatory Pressure on Amazon

This Prime Day lawsuit comes amid heightened regulatory scrutiny of Amazon’s business practices, particularly around its Prime membership program. In September 2025, the FTC announced a historic $2.5 billion settlement with Amazon over allegations that the company used deceptive user interfaces to enroll consumers in Prime without their clear consent and made cancellation unnecessarily difficult.

That settlement included:

  • $1 billion in civil penalties.
  • $1.5 billion in consumer redress, with refunds going to an estimated 35 million affected customers.
  • New requirements for clear disclosures, easy cancellation, and a conspicuous option to decline Prime during checkout.

While the Prime enrollment case is separate from the Prime Day pricing lawsuit, together they paint a picture of a company under pressure to be more transparent about how it markets and monetizes its services. The FTC’s actions signal that regulators are willing to impose significant financial and operational consequences when they believe consumer protections have been violated.

What This Means for Shoppers

For consumers, the lawsuit raises important questions about how to evaluate Prime Day (and similar) deals:

  • Don’t trust percentage-off claims blindly: A large percentage discount is only meaningful if the “original” price was a real, recent selling price.
  • Check price history: Use browser extensions or third-party tools that track historical prices to see whether the current “sale” price is actually lower than recent levels.
  • Compare across retailers: Even if a deal looks good on Amazon, it may be worth checking major competitors like Walmart, Target, or Best Buy to see if the same item is available for less.
  • Be skeptical of urgency: Limited-time offers can be legitimate, but they can also be used to pressure purchases. If a deal feels too good to be true, it’s worth pausing to verify the actual savings.

Shoppers who believe they were misled by Prime Day pricing may also want to monitor the progress of the class action, as it could eventually lead to refunds or changes in how Amazon displays discounts.

Impact on Third-Party Sellers

Amazon’s Prime Day is a critical sales period for many third-party sellers on the platform. The lawsuit could have indirect effects on how sellers approach pricing and promotions:

  • Increased scrutiny of list prices: If Amazon changes its policies to avoid legal risk, sellers may face stricter rules about what prices can be used as “original” or “list” prices in their own listings.
  • Pressure for transparency: As consumers become more aware of potential pricing tricks, sellers who are transparent about their pricing history may gain a competitive advantage.
  • Platform policy changes: Amazon may update its guidelines for Prime Day deals, requiring sellers to provide evidence of recent selling prices before allowing large percentage-off claims.

For sellers, the takeaway is that pricing transparency is becoming less optional. Practices that once seemed like harmless marketing may now carry legal and reputational risk.

What Could Happen Next?

The lawsuit is still in its early stages. Several possible outcomes could unfold:

  • Class certification: If the court certifies the proposed class, the case could involve millions of consumers and potentially lead to significant damages or injunctive relief.
  • Settlement: Given Amazon’s recent $2.5 billion FTC settlement, the company may prefer to resolve this lawsuit rather than face a lengthy trial and further negative publicity.
  • Policy changes: Even if the case doesn’t result in a large monetary award, it could pressure Amazon to change how it calculates and displays percentage-off discounts during Prime Day and other sales events.
  • Regulatory follow-up: State attorneys general or the FTC could launch their own investigations into Prime Day pricing if the lawsuit uncovers widespread deceptive practices.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the Amazon Prime Day class action lawsuit about?

The lawsuit alleges that Amazon uses inflated or fictional “list prices” to make Prime Day discounts appear larger than they really are, misleading consumers about the true value of the deals.

Who can join the class action?

The proposed class includes U.S. consumers who were Amazon Prime members and bought a product during Prime Day that was advertised with a percentage discount based on a strikethrough reference price, when the product had not been sold at that price on Amazon within the prior 90 days.

Has Amazon admitted wrongdoing?

No. Amazon has not yet responded to the lawsuit, and the company has not admitted any wrongdoing in connection with these allegations.

Could this lead to refunds for shoppers?

If the lawsuit is successful, either through trial or settlement, affected consumers could potentially receive monetary compensation or other relief, such as changes to how Amazon displays discounts.

Are all Prime Day deals fake?

The lawsuit does not claim that every Prime Day deal is fake. Instead, it argues that the use of inflated reference prices to generate large percentage-off claims is a widespread practice that misleads consumers about the size of the discounts.

How can I protect myself during Prime Day?

Compare prices across retailers, check historical price data, be skeptical of urgency tactics, and focus on the actual dollar amount you’re paying rather than just the percentage off.

References

  1. Proposed Class Action Alleges Amazon Prime Day Uses Fake List Prices — ClassAction.org. 2025-09-22. https://www.classaction.org/news/prime-day-lawsuit-alleges-four-day-amazon-event-is-rife-with-fake-sales
  2. FTC Secures Historic $2.5 Billion Settlement Against Amazon — Federal Trade Commission. 2025-09-25. https://www.ftc.gov/news-events/news/press-releases/2025/09/ftc-secures-historic-25-billion-settlement-against-amazon
  3. Amazon Prime Refunds Are Going Out After $2.5 Billion Settlement — CBS News. 2025-11-12. https://www.cbsnews.com/news/amazon-prime-refunds-settlement-payment-how-long/
Medha Deb is an editor with a master's degree in Applied Linguistics from the University of Hyderabad. She believes that her qualification has helped her develop a deep understanding of language and its application in various contexts.

Read full bio of medha deb