Salary History Bans: What Employers Need to Know
Navigate the evolving landscape of salary history inquiries with this comprehensive guide to state laws, employer obligations, and best practices for fair hiring.
Across the United States, a growing number of states and localities have implemented laws restricting employers from inquiring about job applicants’ prior wages. These measures aim to combat wage disparities, particularly the gender pay gap, by preventing past salaries—often influenced by discrimination—from perpetuating unequal pay in new roles. This article examines the scope of these bans, key provisions, exceptions, and practical guidance for compliance.
The Rise of Salary History Restrictions
Salary history bans emerged as a policy response to evidence that relying on previous pay can lock in historical inequities. By January 2018, California became one of the first states to prohibit employers from seeking or using applicants’ salary history, setting a precedent for others.Today, over a dozen states and numerous cities enforce similar rules, with penalties ranging from fines to reputational damage.
These laws typically bar employers from asking about past compensation during hiring processes, including interviews, applications, or background checks. The goal is to shift focus toward skills, experience, and market rates, fostering more equitable wage determinations.
State-by-State Overview of Bans
Legislation varies by jurisdiction, with some applying to all employers and others limited to public sector roles. Below is a table summarizing major state laws, including effective dates and key restrictions.
| State | Employers Affected | Key Prohibitions | Effective Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| New York | All | Cannot ask or use salary history; applies to current employees for promotions; voluntary disclosure allowed. | Jan 6, 2020 |
| New Jersey | All | No screening by salary history; fines up to $10,000; internal transfers exempt. | Jan 1, 2020 |
| California | All, including government | Cannot seek or use history, even if volunteered; must provide pay scale on request. | Jan 1, 2018 |
| Colorado | All | No inquiries or use in setting pay; no retaliation for non-disclosure. | Varies |
| Connecticut | All | No requests unless voluntarily disclosed. | Varies |
| Delaware | All | No screening or inquiries; verification post-offer allowed. | Dec 14, 2017 |
| Massachusetts | All | No requests; confirmation post-offer or voluntary OK; cannot defend discrimination claims. | Jul 1, 2018 |
The Future of AI: Preventing a Big Tech Monopoly >
This table highlights common patterns: blanket prohibitions on inquiries, with limited exceptions. Localities like New York City, Atlanta, and Washington D.C. add layers, often extending to private employers.
Core Prohibitions for Employers
Under these laws, employers face strict limits:
- Direct Inquiries Banned: No oral or written questions about prior wages, bonuses, or benefits during applications or interviews.
- Indirect Sourcing Prohibited: Cannot contact former employers or use third parties to obtain salary data without applicant consent post-offer.
- No Reliance on Known History: Even accidentally obtained information cannot influence pay decisions.
- Application Forms: Salary fields must be removed or marked non-mandatory for covered jurisdictions.
Violations can lead to civil penalties: New Jersey imposes up to $10,000 for repeat offenses, while others risk lawsuits or agency enforcement.
Important Exceptions and Permissions
Not all scenarios trigger bans. Key allowances include:
- Voluntary Disclosure: Applicants may share history unprompted (e.g., to negotiate higher pay), and employers can then verify and consider it. “Optional” questions on forms do not qualify as voluntary.
- Current Employees: For promotions or transfers, existing salary data can be used.
- Post-Offer Verification: Some states permit confirmation after a job offer with full compensation details.
- Rehires: Prior employees’ history remains usable.
- Non-Monetary Inquiries: Questions about commission experience (not value) are allowed in sales roles.
Employers must provide pay ranges upon request in places like California, promoting transparency.
Impact on Hiring and Pay Equity
These bans encourage market-based pricing, reducing perpetuation of pay gaps. Studies show women and minorities often enter negotiations with lower baselines due to prior discrimination. By decoupling history from offers, employers base pay on qualifications, narrowing disparities.
For businesses, compliance avoids fines exceeding $250,000 in some cases and protects employer branding. Multistate employers must customize applications, instructing out-of-state applicants accordingly.
Best Practices for Compliant Hiring
To navigate these laws:
- Review Policies: Audit job apps, interview guides, and HR scripts for banned questions.
- Train Staff: Educate recruiters on prohibitions and exceptions.
- Use Pay Bands: Disclose salary ranges early to set expectations.
- Document Decisions: Base offers on objective criteria like skills and market data.
- Background Checks: Instruct vendors to exclude salary history.
- Monitor Local Laws: Track updates, as expansions continue (e.g., D.C. private sector in 2024).
Implement internal pay audits to ensure equity across protected classes, complying with broader anti-discrimination statutes.
Navigating Multistate Operations
Companies with national footprints face complexity. A uniform application might violate New Jersey rules while complying elsewhere. Solutions include geo-targeted forms or disclaimers: “Do not answer if applying for NJ-based roles.” Legal counsel is advisable for tailored compliance.
Common Pitfalls to Avoid
- Assuming “stumbled-upon” data is usable—it’s not.
- Framing questions as optional to elicit voluntary responses—prohibited.
- Ignoring city-level bans amid state compliance.
- Using history for current employees in external hires.
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)
Can employers ever ask about salary history?
Generally no, but after a job offer or if voluntarily disclosed without prompting, verification is allowed in many jurisdictions.
What if an applicant brings it up first?
Employers may consider and confirm the information provided.
Does this apply to benefits or bonuses?
Yes, bans cover total compensation history.
Are there penalties for violations?
Yes, fines from $1,000 to $10,000+ per offense, plus potential lawsuits.
How do I handle multistate applications?
Include instructions excluding salary questions for banned areas.
Future Trends in Pay Transparency
Beyond bans, momentum builds for mandatory pay range disclosures in job postings (e.g., Colorado, NYC). As of 2026, expect further adoptions, emphasizing skills-based hiring. Employers proactive in equity will gain talent advantages in competitive markets.
References
- Salary History Ban – What You Need To Know — State of New York. 2020-01-06. https://www.ny.gov/salary-history-ban/salary-history-ban-what-you-need-know
- US: New Jersey To Ban Salary History Inquiries — Mercer. 2019-07-25. https://www.mercer.com/insights/law-and-policy/us-new-jersey-to-ban-salary-history-inquiries/
- When Asking Candidates About Salary History Is and Isn’t OK — ADP. 2022-06-01. https://www.adp.com/spark/articles/2022/06/when-asking-candidates-about-salary-history-is-and-isnt-ok.aspx
- States with Salary History Bans: Employer’s Guide — Paycor. N/A. https://www.paycor.com/resource-center/articles/states-with-salary-history-bans/
- A running list of states and localities that have outlawed pay history — HR Dive. 2019-11-01. https://www.hrdive.com/news/salary-history-ban-states-list/516662/
- Salary History Law: Frequently Asked Questions — NYC.gov. N/A. https://www.nyc.gov/site/cchr/media/salary-history-frequently-asked-questions.page
Similar Articles
Read full bio of Sneha Tete
