Understanding the Contract Duty of Good Faith and Fair Dealing

The

implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing

is a foundational rule in contract law: in virtually every contract, each party must act honestly and fairly so the other can receive the benefits of the bargain. This duty applies even when it is not written into the agreement and focuses on how parties perform and enforce their contractual obligations.

1. What Does Good Faith and Fair Dealing Mean?

In legal terms,

good faith and fair dealing

describes a baseline of conduct expected from all contracting parties. It requires behavior that is honest, reasonable, and consistent with the agreed purpose of the contract and the other party’s justified expectations.

Under modern commercial law, good faith typically includes two core components:

• Honesty in fact – telling the truth and avoiding deception in performing the contract.
• Observance of reasonable commercial standards of fair dealing – following accepted business norms of fairness in the relevant industry or market.

According to leading contract authorities, every contract imposes a duty on each party to act in a way that does not destroy or injure the other party’s right to receive the fruits of the agreement. This means parties cannot use technicalities, discretion, or vague wording to undermine the deal’s core purpose.

Read More

When and How Insurers Can Cancel Your Auto Policy >

2. Where Does the Duty Come From?

The duty of good faith and fair dealing is recognized in both common law doctrines and statutory rules.

2.1 Common Law Principles

The Restatement (Second) of Contracts states that every contract imposes upon each party a duty of good faith and fair dealing in its performance and enforcement. Courts use this principle to interpret agreements and fill gaps where the contract is silent but the parties’ expectations are clear.

Key aspects of this common law doctrine include:

• It is an implied term in every contract, even if not written.
• It focuses on performance and enforcement, not necessarily pre-contract negotiations.
• It is used to prevent arbitrary, unreasonable, or opportunistic conduct that frustrates the bargain.

2.2 Statutory Recognition in Commercial Law

In the United States, the

Uniform Commercial Code (UCC)

, which governs many sales and commercial transactions, defines good faith as “honesty in fact and the observance of reasonable commercial standards of fair dealing.” This standard applies to merchants and, in many contexts, to all parties in UCC-governed contracts.

The combination of the Restatement and the UCC makes the duty of good faith and fair dealing a pervasive feature of contract law across many types of agreements: sales contracts, service agreements, franchise arrangements, financing documents, and more.

3. Good Faith vs. Express Contract Terms

Parties often include their own clauses on

good faith

or standards of conduct in contracts. The implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing is distinct from these express provisions.

3.1 Implied Covenant vs. Express Good Faith Standard

Feature	Implied Covenant of Good Faith and Fair Dealing	Express Contractual Good Faith Clause
Source	Imposed by law and case precedent.	Specifically written into the contract by the parties.
Scope	Applies to performance and enforcement of all obligations.	Limited to the situations described in the clause.
Purpose	Protects reasonable expectations and prevents abuse of discretion.	Sets a particular standard (subjective or objective) for defined actions.
Can it be waived?	Generally cannot be fully eliminated by contract.	May be modified by the parties, subject to legal limits.

Even when an agreement includes a detailed good faith standard, courts typically hold that the implied covenant still exists and can provide an additional basis for enforcing the parties’ expectations.

4. How Good Faith and Fair Dealing Works in Practice

The duty of good faith and fair dealing does not require parties to act selflessly or give up legitimate contractual rights. Instead, it limits how parties can exercise those rights and discretion.

4.1 Typical Applications

Common scenarios where the implied covenant plays a central role include:

• Exercise of contractual discretion – When a party has the right to make decisions (such as approving a subcontractor or setting prices), it must exercise that discretion reasonably and in good faith, not for arbitrary or retaliatory reasons.
• Conditioning performance – A party cannot manipulate conditions precedent or deadlines purely to force a breach or avoid its own obligations.
• Performance cooperation – Each party must cooperate as reasonably necessary for the other to perform and benefit from the contract.
• Enforcement and remedies – Even in enforcing rights (like termination or penalties), a party must not act with improper motive intended to deprive the other of the bargain.

Courts often examine the parties’ behavior against the backdrop of industry standards, prior dealings, and the contract’s overall purpose to determine whether the duty has been met.

4.2 Conduct That May Breach the Duty

While each case is fact-specific, the following types of conduct frequently trigger claims of breach of the implied covenant:

• Engaging in deliberate tactics to block or delay the other party’s performance to create a technical default.
• Exercising discretionary rights (such as withholding approval) for reasons unrelated to the contract’s purpose.
• Using vague language or legal loopholes to mislead or confuse the other party and then exploiting that confusion.
• Acting with an improper motive designed to destroy or injure the other party’s right to receive the expected benefits of the contract.

By contrast, simple negligence, honest mistakes, or business judgments made in good faith usually do not amount to a breach of the implied covenant.

5. Proving a Breach of Good Faith and Fair Dealing

Bringing a claim for breach of the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing generally requires proof of several elements. While the specific requirements vary by jurisdiction, common features include:

• Existence of a valid contract – The parties must have an enforceable agreement, which may be written, oral, or implied by conduct.
• Contractual expectations and obligations – The plaintiff must show what benefits or performance were reasonably expected under the contract.
• Unfair or dishonest conduct by the defendant – The defendant’s actions must violate the implied duty by frustrating those expectations through arbitrary or improper behavior.
• Causation and damages – The plaintiff must prove that the breach caused measurable harm, such as financial loss, reputational damage, or other injury.

In some jurisdictions, a claim for breach of the implied covenant cannot stand alone and must be tied to an underlying breach of an express contract term. In others, courts may treat it as a separate but closely related cause of action, depending on the facts and legal framework.

5.1 Evidentiary Considerations

Evidence in a good faith and fair dealing claim often includes:

• The contract text and any amendments.
• Emails, letters, and internal documents showing motives or decision-making.
• Witness testimony on industry practices and the parties’ past dealings.
• Financial records demonstrating losses linked to the alleged breach.

Courts may also consider whether the defendant knew their conduct was likely to violate the other party’s expectations, or whether they acted with reckless disregard for those expectations.

6. Relationship to Fiduciary Duties and Other Obligations

The duty of good faith and fair dealing is distinct from

fiduciary duties

and other heightened standards of loyalty that arise in special relationships (such as trustee-beneficiary or corporate director-shareholder). A fiduciary duty can require a party to put another’s interests ahead of their own in certain contexts, while the implied covenant of good faith simply requires parties not to abuse their contractual rights.

Important distinctions include:

• Scope – Fiduciary duties are broader and often apply to many aspects of the relationship; the implied covenant is limited to the contract’s performance and enforcement.
• Origins – Fiduciary duties arise from special roles or legal obligations; the implied covenant arises from the contract itself and general contract law.
• Expectations – Fiduciaries may have to act in the best interests of another; contracting parties can pursue their own interests but must do so honestly and fairly under the agreement.

7. Practical Strategies to Honor Good Faith and Fair Dealing

Businesses and individuals can reduce the risk of disputes about good faith by planning ahead and adopting transparent practices.

7.1 Drafting Contracts with Clarity

• Define discretionary powers – Clearly state when and how a party may exercise discretion, and specify any objective standards (such as commercially reasonable efforts).
• Address key risks – Identify areas where opportunistic behavior might arise (pricing adjustments, termination rights, approvals) and set fair processes to manage them.
• Use plain language – Avoid unnecessary complexity that can lead to misunderstandings and later claims of unfair dealing.

7.2 Managing Performance and Relationships

• Communicate early and often – Share information relevant to performance and potential problems to avoid surprise harms.
• Document decisions – Keep a record of significant decisions and the reasons for them, especially when exercising contractual discretion.
• Align with industry standards – Follow established commercial norms to demonstrate that actions reflect reasonable and customary practice.

These measures not only support compliance with the implied covenant but also strengthen the evidentiary record if a dispute arises.

8. Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)

8.1 Is the duty of good faith and fair dealing in every contract?

In most U.S. jurisdictions, yes. Courts generally recognize an implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing in every contract, whether or not the parties mention it explicitly.

8.2 Can parties waive the implied covenant by agreement?

Parties can shape how they will cooperate and define certain standards of conduct, but they typically cannot completely eliminate the implied covenant. Courts usually retain the power to prevent conduct that fundamentally undermines the bargain.

8.3 Does the duty cover pre-contract negotiations?

In many jurisdictions, the implied covenant focuses on performance and enforcement after a contract is formed. Some legal systems recognize separate duties of honest negotiation or pre-contract good faith, but those are distinct doctrines and may depend on local law.

8.4 Is bad faith the same as fraud?

Not necessarily. Bad faith can involve dishonest or improper motives that frustrate contractual expectations, even if they do not rise to the level of fraud. Fraud requires specific elements such as intentional misrepresentation and reliance, while a breach of the implied covenant focuses on unfair interference with the contract’s benefits.

8.5 What remedies are available for breach of good faith and fair dealing?

Remedies usually follow standard contract principles: monetary damages, and in some cases equitable relief such as injunctions or specific performance, depending on the jurisdiction and the harm caused.