Racial Discrimination in the Workplace: Rights, Examples, and Legal Remedies

Racial discrimination at work remains a persistent problem, even though it has been illegal in the United States for decades. Federal, state, and sometimes local laws protect workers from being treated unfairly because of their race, the color of their skin, ethnic characteristics, or association with people of a particular race. Understanding how the law defines racial discrimination, what it looks like in practice, and what remedies are available can help employees and employers respond effectively and lawfully.

1. What Is Racial Discrimination at Work?

Racial discrimination in employment occurs when an employer or workplace decision-maker treats a person less favorably because of race, color, or traits closely linked to race, or when neutral policies disproportionately harm a racial group without a valid business justification. In the U.S., the core federal protection comes from Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, which applies to most employers with 15 or more employees.

Race-related protections typically cover:

• Race – Being Black, White, Asian, Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander, American Indian or Alaska Native, or multiracial.
• Color – The lightness or darkness of an individual’s skin tone, even within the same racial group.
• Ethnic and cultural characteristics – Names, accents, and cultural practices closely associated with a racial or ethnic group.
• Perceived race – Protection applies even if the perception of someone’s race is inaccurate.
• Association – Relationships with people of a particular race, such as a spouse, friends, or community ties.

These protections typically extend across the full employment life cycle, including recruiting, hiring, training, pay, promotion, discipline, and termination decisions.

2. How Common Is Racial Discrimination in the Workplace?

Although some people believe racial bias is diminishing, empirical research shows that discrimination remains widespread. A 2024 meta-analysis of studies on workplace microaggressions and racial discrimination found that about 18.8% of workers reported racial discrimination at work, while microaggressions related to race had a pooled prevalence of 73.6%. Microaggressions can include subtle insults, exclusion from opportunities, or repeated assumptions about a person’s role or competence.

Broader discrimination statistics underscore the scope of the issue:

• In the United Kingdom, survey data from 2025 showed that over two-thirds of respondents from ethnic minority groups reported experiencing discrimination either at work or during hiring, compared with much lower rates among White respondents.
• In U.S. retail work, one study of a large national retailer found that nearly half (47%) of workers reported witnessing or experiencing racial discrimination at work, and workers of color experienced disproportionate levels of discipline and termination.
• Race-based claims are among the more common discrimination complaints in many employment tribunal and agency filings, even though they do not represent the majority of all discrimination cases.

These data points demonstrate that racial discrimination is rarely an isolated incident; it is often embedded in organizational culture, decision-making, and systemic practices.

3. Key Legal Protections Against Racial Discrimination

Several overlapping legal frameworks provide protection against race-based discrimination in employment.

Federal antidiscrimination laws are enforced by the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC), which investigates charges, attempts conciliation, and sometimes brings lawsuits. Recent data show rising discrimination activity: in fiscal year 2024, the EEOC received 88,531 new discrimination charges, a 9.2% increase from the prior year, and recovered a record $665 million in monetary benefits for workers.

4. Forms of Racial Discrimination in Employment Decisions

Racial discrimination rarely appears as an explicit policy; instead, it often shows up in patterns of decisions and treatment. The law recognizes both intentional (disparate treatment) and systemic (disparate impact) forms.

4.1 Hiring and Recruitment

Racial bias can taint the earliest stages of employment, including:

• Job advertisements that discourage or effectively exclude certain groups.
• Screening résumés differently based on names or perceived race.
• Referring only certain racial groups to hiring managers or better positions.
• Relying heavily on “word-of-mouth” recruitment in racially homogeneous networks.

Studies on labor markets show ongoing racial gaps in hiring, even when qualifications are similar, indicating that discrimination continues to influence who gets access to jobs and interviews.

4.2 Assignments, Pay, and Promotions

Once hired, employees may face race-based disparities in day-to-day work:

• Assigning workers of color to less desirable shifts or locations.
• Paying employees of different races differently for substantially similar work.
• Limiting access to high-visibility projects, training, or leadership opportunities.
• Applying stricter performance standards to some racial groups than others.

Data from a large U.S. retailer showed that workers of color reported higher rates of discriminatory discipline and layoffs than White workers, suggesting systemic bias in how performance and conduct were evaluated.

4.3 Discipline and Termination

Discrimination often appears in who gets written up, suspended, or let go. Warning signs may include:

• More severe discipline for similar conduct by workers of color compared with White coworkers.
• “Restructurings” or layoffs that disproportionately affect employees of a particular race without a clear, legitimate explanation.
• Using vague or shifting justifications for firing a worker who complained of racial discrimination.

In the REI worker survey, over 30% of workers of color reported witnessing or experiencing racial discrimination in layoffs and discharges, compared with lower rates among White employees, highlighting how race can influence job security.

5. Racial Harassment and Hostile Work Environment

Racial discrimination is not limited to formal decisions; it also includes racial harassment that creates a hostile, intimidating, or offensive work environment. This can take many forms, including:

• Racial slurs, epithets, or derogatory jokes.
• Offensive images, symbols, or emails targeting a racial group.
• Persistent stereotyping about competence, work ethic, or criminality.
• Exclusion from work-related social events or communications because of race.
• Subtle but repeated microaggressions, such as questioning a person’s qualifications or belonging.

To be legally actionable, harassment usually must be severe or pervasive enough that a reasonable person would find the environment hostile or abusive, and the victim actually experiences it that way. However, a single incident can be sufficient if it is extremely severe (for example, a threat of violence accompanied by racial epithets).

6. Retaliation for Opposing Racial Discrimination

Workers are not only protected from racial discrimination itself; they are also protected from retaliation for asserting their rights. Retaliation occurs when an employer punishes an individual for:

• Filing an internal complaint or grievance about racial bias.
• Reporting discrimination to a government agency such as the EEOC.
• Participating as a witness in an investigation or lawsuit.
• Refusing to follow racially discriminatory instructions.

Examples of retaliation include being demoted, denied a previously expected promotion, reassigned to worse shifts, or terminated shortly after making a complaint. Retaliation claims are among the most common types filed with the EEOC, reflecting how often workers face backlash for speaking up.

7. Employer Responsibilities and Best Practices

Employers have both legal and practical reasons to prevent and correct racial discrimination. Beyond avoiding lawsuits, organizations that address discrimination tend to have better morale, retention, and productivity.

7.1 Core Legal Duties

Under federal law and many state laws, employers are generally required to:

• Avoid discriminatory practices in recruiting, hiring, pay, promotions, and termination.
• Respond promptly to complaints of racial harassment or discrimination.
• Take reasonable steps to stop harassment and prevent it from recurring once they know or should know about it.
• Maintain records related to employment decisions, which may be reviewed during an investigation.

7.2 Building an Anti-Discrimination Culture

Policy-focused and culture-focused measures often work together most effectively. Research and policy analyses show that well-designed diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) efforts can help reduce discrimination when they are tied to accountability and structural change, rather than one-off training.

Effective strategies include:

• Clear, written anti-discrimination and anti-harassment policies that define racial discrimination and explain reporting procedures.
• Mandatory and recurring training for managers and employees on recognizing and preventing racial bias and microaggressions.
• Standardized criteria for hiring, evaluation, and promotion to reduce discretion that can allow bias to influence decisions.
• Regular pay equity and workforce audits to identify racial disparities in pay, promotion rates, or discipline.
• Multiple, accessible reporting channels so workers can raise concerns without fear, including anonymous options.
• Visible leadership commitment, including holding managers accountable when discrimination is substantiated.

8. What Workers Can Do If They Experience Racial Discrimination

Workers who suspect they are facing racial discrimination are often unsure where to start. While every situation is unique and legal advice from a qualified attorney is important, several practical steps are commonly recommended.

8.1 Documenting Incidents

Consistent documentation can be critical in proving what happened. Workers may choose to:

• Write down dates, times, locations, what was said or done, and who witnessed each incident.
• Save copies of relevant emails, text messages, performance reviews, and schedules, where permitted by employer policy and law.
• Track changes in assignments, pay, or discipline that occurred after reporting a concern.

8.2 Using Internal Reporting Channels

Many employers require or encourage workers to first report problems internally unless doing so would be unsafe. Options may include:

• Reporting to a supervisor or another manager.
• Contacting the human resources (HR) department or compliance office.
• Using anonymous hotlines or online reporting tools, if available.

Filing an internal complaint helps the organization correct issues and also creates a record that the employer was on notice of the problem.

8.3 Filing an External Charge or Lawsuit

When internal avenues fail or the discrimination is severe, workers can often pursue external remedies:

• In federal cases under Title VII, workers usually must first file a charge of discrimination with the EEOC or a state or local fair employment agency before going to court.
• Deadlines to file with the EEOC are typically short (often 180 or 300 days from the last discriminatory act, depending on the state), so acting promptly is important.
• After the agency investigates, it may pursue the case itself, or issue a “right-to-sue” notice allowing the worker to file a lawsuit in court.

Potential remedies can include back pay, reinstatement, compensatory and sometimes punitive damages, policy changes, and attorney’s fees, depending on the law at issue.

9. Racial Discrimination, Mental Health, and Organizational Impact

Racial discrimination has consequences that go far beyond an individual job. Studies show that workplace racial discrimination and microaggressions are linked to increased stress, anxiety, depression, and physical health problems for the affected employees. These harms can persist over the long term and influence career trajectories, earnings, and overall well-being.

For organizations, the costs of allowing discrimination to persist include:

• Higher turnover, especially among workers of color.
• Lower engagement, creativity, and trust.
• Legal costs and reputational damage from agency charges and lawsuits.
• Reduced ability to attract and retain diverse talent in competitive labor markets.

In this context, preventing racial discrimination is not merely a matter of legal compliance; it is fundamental to building sustainable, productive, and equitable workplaces.

10. Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)

Q1: Is racial discrimination illegal even if it is subtle?

Yes. The law does not require racial discrimination to be overt or explicit to be illegal. Subtle patterns of unequal treatment, biased performance standards, coded language, or seemingly neutral policies that disproportionately harm a racial group can all be unlawful when they affect employment opportunities or create a hostile work environment.

Q2: Can an employer be liable for racial jokes between coworkers?

An employer may be legally responsible if it knows or should know that employees are engaging in racist jokes, slurs, or other harassment and fails to act promptly and effectively to stop it. Employers can reduce liability by enforcing clear policies, training employees, and responding quickly to complaints.

Q3: What if my employer treats people differently based on accent?

Accent and language-related discrimination can violate federal law when it is closely tied to a person’s race or national origin and is not justified by a genuine business need. For example, rejecting a qualified applicant because of a foreign accent can be illegal if the accent does not materially interfere with job performance.

Q4: Do small employers have to follow anti-discrimination laws?

While Title VII generally applies to employers with 15 or more employees, many state and local anti-discrimination laws cover smaller employers. Additionally, some federal statutes, such as 42 U.S.C. § 1981, apply regardless of employer size. Workers at very small organizations should review state law or consult an attorney about available protections.

Q5: Do I need a lawyer to file with the EEOC?

You are not required to have a lawyer to file an EEOC charge. However, employment law can be complex, deadlines are strict, and strategic choices about evidence and claims can affect the outcome. Many workers find it helpful to consult an attorney early, particularly when considering litigation.

Similar Articles

Using Infographics to Explain Law and Engage Clients

Concierge Litigation Support: How Premium Services Transform Law Firm Workflows

Smart Legal Outsourcing: Tasks That Give You Time Back

Managing Time-Draining Legal Clients Effectively

Streamlining Court Filing Corrections with Smart Re-Submission Tools

From Formal to Flexible: How Law Firms Are Redefining Professionalism

Author

medha deb

 

Medha Deb is an editor with a master's degree in Applied Linguistics from the University of Hyderabad. She believes that her qualification has helped her develop a deep understanding of language and its application in various contexts.

Read full bio of medha deb